city: be located close to water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.73
, school district
Weight: 0.71
, park
Weight: 0.69
, sewer
Weight: 0.68
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.83
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.82
, new york city
Weight: 0.72
, mexico city
Weight: 0.71
, medina
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be located close to water 1.00
be located near water 0.93
is located 0.88
be located near bodies of water 0.88
where located 0.88
be located near ocean 0.88
located 0.87
be located by body of water 0.87
be located on river 0.87
be located near rivers 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(city, be located close to water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(town, be located by body of water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(city, be located close to water)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(town, be located on river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(city, be located close to water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(town, be located on river)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(town, be located by body of water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(town, be located on river)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(town, be located by body of water)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(city, be located close to water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(town, be located by body of water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(city, be located close to water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(town, be located on river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(city, be located close to water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(city, be located close to water)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(city, be located near water)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(city, be located near water)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(city, be located near ocean)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(city, be located near ocean)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(city, be located on river)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(city, be located on river)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(city, is located)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(city, be located on river)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(city, be located near bodies of water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(city, be located by body of water)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(city, be located near bodies of water)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(city, is located)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(city, be located near ocean)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, be located by body of water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(city, be located near water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(city, is located)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(city, be located near water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(city, is located)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(city, be located on river)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(city, be located by body of water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(city, be located near ocean)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(city, be located near bodies of water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(city, be located by body of water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, be located near bodies of water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(city, be located close to water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(city, be located close to water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(town, be located by body of water)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(town, be located on river)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(town, be located by body of water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(city, be located close to water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(town, be located on river)