town: be located near bodies of water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents municipality
Weight: 0.69
, area
Weight: 0.69
, community
Weight: 0.69
, school district
Weight: 0.64
, site
Weight: 0.64
Siblings village
Weight: 0.76
, city
Weight: 0.73
, town square
Weight: 0.72
, borough
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be located near bodies of water 1.00
be located near bodies 0.98
be located by body of water 0.92
be located by body 0.88
be located on river 0.87
were established near river 0.83
be built near rivers 0.81
devlope near rivers 0.79
develop near rivers 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(city, be located on river)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(city, develop near rivers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(city, be located near bodies of water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, be located near bodies)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, be located by body of water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(city, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(city, be located near bodies of water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(city, be located near bodies)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(city, be located near bodies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(city, be located by body of water)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(city, be located by body of water)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(city, be located on river)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(city, be located on river)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(city, develop near rivers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(city, develop near rivers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(town, be located near bodies of water)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(town, be located near bodies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(town, be located near bodies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(town, be located near bodies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(town, be located on river)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(town, be located by body of water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(town, be located by body of water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(town, be located on river)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(town, be built near rivers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(town, be built near rivers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(town, be located by body of water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(town, develop near rivers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(town, be located by body)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(town, be located by body)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(town, be located by body)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(town, were established near river)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(town, be located by body of water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(town, develop near rivers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(town, be built near rivers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(town, be located by body)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(town, be located on river)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(town, were established near river)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(town, develop near rivers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(town, be built near rivers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(town, be located on river)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(town, were established near river)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(town, were established near river)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(town, develop near rivers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(town, be located near bodies of water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(city, be located on river)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(city, be located near bodies)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(city, develop near rivers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(city, be located by body of water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(town, be located near bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(city, be located near bodies of water)