clarinet: has quality cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woodwind instrument
Weight: 0.76
, wind instrument
Weight: 0.69
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.69
, instrument
Weight: 0.69
, brass instrument
Weight: 0.62
Siblings bass clarinet
Weight: 0.80
, flute
Weight: 0.41
, saxophone
Weight: 0.41
, percussion instrument
Weight: 0.40
, oboe
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality cost 1.00
is quality 0.86
has quality better 0.83
has quality good 0.82
has quality bad 0.81
is value 0.77
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(woodwind instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wind instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(brass instrument, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(musical instrument, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(woodwind instrument, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(instrument, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(brass instrument, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(wind instrument, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(woodwind instrument, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(instrument, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(woodwind instrument, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(woodwind instrument, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(instrument, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(woodwind instrument, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, is quality)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oboe, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(flute, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(bass clarinet, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(brass instrument, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(woodwind instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wind instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(musical instrument, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(woodwind instrument, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(instrument, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(brass instrument, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(flute, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(oboe, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(oboe, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(saxophone, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(saxophone, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(bass clarinet, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bass clarinet, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(flute, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(flute, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(clarinet, has quality cost)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(clarinet, is value)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(clarinet, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(clarinet, is value)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(clarinet, is value)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, is value)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(clarinet, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(clarinet, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, is quality)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wind instrument, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(brass instrument, is expensive)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(instrument, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(woodwind instrument, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(woodwind instrument, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(musical instrument, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(oboe, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(flute, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flute, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(saxophone, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bass clarinet, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, is quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wind instrument, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(woodwind instrument, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(brass instrument, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(instrument, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(woodwind instrument, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(musical instrument, is expensive)