flute: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woodwind instrument
Weight: 0.74
, instrument
Weight: 0.70
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.69
, brass instrument
Weight: 0.65
, acoustic guitar
Weight: 0.64
Siblings clarinet
Weight: 0.41
, percussion instrument
Weight: 0.41
, oboe
Weight: 0.40
, cello
Weight: 0.39
, saxophone
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
has quality cost 0.82
has quality price 0.80
has quality questions 0.76
is best 0.76
sound together good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(woodwind instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flute, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flute, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flute, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flute, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(brass instrument, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flute, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(acoustic guitar, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flute, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flute, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(woodwind instrument, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, has quality price)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(woodwind instrument, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, has quality price)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, sound together good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(woodwind instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(flute, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(flute, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(flute, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(flute, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(brass instrument, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(flute, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(acoustic guitar, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(flute, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(brass instrument, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(flute, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(clarinet, sound together good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(clarinet, sound together good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(saxophone, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(saxophone, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(flute, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flute, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, is quality)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(woodwind instrument, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(clarinet, sound together good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(woodwind instrument, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, is quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(flute, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, has quality price)