saxophone: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woodwind instrument
Weight: 0.72
, instrument
Weight: 0.69
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.68
, wind instrument
Weight: 0.68
, woodwind
Weight: 0.68
Siblings clarinet
Weight: 0.41
, percussion instrument
Weight: 0.40
, sax
Weight: 0.40
, bass clarinet
Weight: 0.40
, flute
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality cost 0.82
has quality questions 0.76
is best 0.76
sound together good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(woodwind instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wind instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(wind instrument, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(woodwind, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(woodwind instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(woodwind instrument, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(woodwind, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(flute, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(clarinet, sound together good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(woodwind instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(woodwind, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wind instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(flute, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(flute, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(clarinet, has quality cost)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(clarinet, sound together good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(clarinet, sound together good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(saxophone, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(saxophone, is best)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, is best)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(saxophone, is best)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality cost)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(saxophone, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wind instrument, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(woodwind, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(woodwind instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clarinet, has quality cost)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flute, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(clarinet, sound together good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wind instrument, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(woodwind, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(saxophone, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(woodwind instrument, has quality good)