client: be with dementia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creditor
Weight: 0.63
, family member
Weight: 0.62
, enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.67
, owner
Weight: 0.63
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.63
, samsung
Weight: 0.62
, rolling stone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with dementia 1.00
be with dementia at risk 0.95
be with dementia at higher risk 0.92
be with dementia at risk for abuse 0.92
be with dementia at higher risk for abuse 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at risk)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at risk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(client, be with dementia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia)