client: be with dementia

Property	Similarity
be with dementia	1.00
be with dementia at risk	0.95
be with dementia at higher risk	0.92
be with dementia at risk for abuse	0.92
be with dementia at higher risk for abuse	0.90

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at risk)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at risk)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(client, be with dementia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)

Parents	creditor Weight: 0.63 , family member Weight: 0.62 , enterprise Weight: 0.61 , partner Weight: 0.61
Siblings	real estate agent Weight: 0.67 , owner Weight: 0.63 , drug dealer Weight: 0.63 , samsung Weight: 0.62 , rolling stone Weight: 0.61

client: be with dementia

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible