client: be with dementia at risk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creditor
Weight: 0.63
, family member
Weight: 0.62
, enterprise
Weight: 0.61
, partner
Weight: 0.61
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.67
, owner
Weight: 0.63
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.63
, samsung
Weight: 0.62
, rolling stone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with dementia at risk 1.00
be with dementia at higher risk 0.98
be with dementia at risk for abuse 0.96
be with dementia 0.95
be with dementia at higher risk for abuse 0.94
has risk for infection 0.77
cause cancer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(partner, cause cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at risk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(partner, cause cancer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(partner, cause cancer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(partner, cause cancer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at risk)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(client, has risk for infection)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at risk for abuse)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(client, be with dementia at higher risk for abuse)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(client, has risk for infection)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(client, has risk for infection)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(client, has risk for infection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(client, be with dementia at risk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(partner, cause cancer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(client, be with dementia at risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(partner, cause cancer)