clip: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scene
Weight: 0.61
, piece
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, device
Weight: 0.54
Siblings paper clip
Weight: 0.72
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.32
, photo
Weight: 0.32
, picture frame
Weight: 0.32
, documentary
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be at office build 0.88
be at office supply store 0.82
be at paper in office supply cabinet 0.80
be at desk 0.78
be at your desk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(clip, be at office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(paper clip, be at office supply store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(paper clip, be at your desk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(clip, be at office)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(paper clip, be at office supply store)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(paper clip, be at office supply store)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(paper clip, be at your desk)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(paper clip, be at your desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(clip, be at office)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(clip, be at office build)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(clip, be at office build)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office build)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at desk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(clip, be at office build)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(clip, be at desk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(clip, be at desk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(clip, be at desk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(clip, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(paper clip, be at your desk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(paper clip, be at office supply store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(clip, be at office)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)