clip: be at office build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scene
Weight: 0.61
, piece
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, device
Weight: 0.54
Siblings paper clip
Weight: 0.72
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.32
, photo
Weight: 0.32
, picture frame
Weight: 0.32
, documentary
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office build 1.00
be at office 0.88
be used to build something 0.81
be at office supply store 0.78
be at paper in office supply cabinet 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(material, be used to build something)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(clip, be at office build)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(clip, be at office build)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(material, be used to build something)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(material, be used to build something)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(paper clip, be at office supply store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(material, be used to build something)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(clip, be at office build)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(clip, be at office build)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(paper clip, be at office supply store)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(paper clip, be at office supply store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(clip, be at office build)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(clip, be at office)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(clip, be at office)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(clip, be at office)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(clip, be at office build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(material, be used to build something)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(paper clip, be at office supply store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(material, be used to build something)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(clip, be at office build)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)