coconut milk: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents milk
Weight: 0.80
, dairy product
Weight: 0.74
, fruit
Weight: 0.71
, coconut
Weight: 0.66
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.43
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.40
, powdered milk
Weight: 0.40
, skim milk
Weight: 0.38
, mango
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
taste bad 0.80
go bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(milk, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(coconut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(coconut, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(milk, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(milk, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coconut, go bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(milk, go bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(milk, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(milk chocolate, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, taste bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(milk, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(coconut, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(skim milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(skim milk, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(milk chocolate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(milk chocolate, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(skim milk, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(skim milk, taste bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(coconut milk, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(coconut milk, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, go bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(coconut milk, go bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, go bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(coconut milk, go bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(coconut milk, taste bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(coconut milk, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, taste bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(coconut milk, taste bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, taste bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(coconut, go bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(milk, go bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(milk, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(skim milk, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(milk chocolate, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(skim milk, taste bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(milk, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(coconut, go bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(milk, go bad)