code: were bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents source code
Weight: 0.68
, concept
Weight: 0.61
, law
Weight: 0.61
, duty
Weight: 0.61
Siblings zip code
Weight: 0.80
, password
Weight: 0.66
, software
Weight: 0.65
, identifier
Weight: 0.62
, reference
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
were bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.81
were used in war 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(code, were bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(code, were bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(code, were bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(code, were used in war)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(code, were used in war)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(code, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(code, were used in war)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(code, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(code, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(code, were used in war)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(code, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(code, were bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(code, were bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(code, were bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)