:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(rod, go bad)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(rod, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rod, go bad)
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(coil, go bad)
Similarity expansion
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(coil, go bad vape)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(coil, go bad vape)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(coil, go bad vape)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(coil, go vape)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(coil, go vape)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(coil, go vape)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(coil, go vape)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(coil, go bad vape)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(coil, taste bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(coil, taste bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coil, taste bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coil, taste bad)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(coil, go bad)
Typical implies Plausible
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(coil, go bad)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(coil, go bad)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(rod, go bad)