cola: be different from fanta

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.71
, flavor
Weight: 0.64
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.63
, soft drink
Weight: 0.58
, soda pop
Weight: 0.58
Siblings coca cola
Weight: 0.71
, soda
Weight: 0.38
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from fanta 1.00
be better than pepsi 0.77
taste different at mcdonald 's 0.77
taste different in different containers 0.77
taste different in cans 0.75
taste different in different countries 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(soft drink, taste different in different countries)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cola, be different from fanta)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste different in different countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste different in different countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, taste different at mcdonald 's)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, taste different in different countries)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(soft drink, taste different in different countries)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cola, be different from fanta)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(coca cola, taste different in different countries)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(coca cola, taste different in different countries)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(coca cola, taste different at mcdonald 's)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(coca cola, taste different at mcdonald 's)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cola, be different from fanta)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cola, be better than pepsi)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cola, be different from fanta)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste different in different countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(coca cola, taste different in different countries)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(coca cola, taste different at mcdonald 's)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(cola, be different from fanta)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste different in different countries)