cola: be better than pepsi

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.71
, flavor
Weight: 0.64
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.63
, soft drink
Weight: 0.58
, soda pop
Weight: 0.58
Siblings coca cola
Weight: 0.71
, soda
Weight: 0.38
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than pepsi 1.00
taste better out of can 0.78
taste better in cans 0.78
better than salt 0.77
be different from fanta 0.77
be cheaper than water 0.76
taste different at mcdonald 's 0.76
be better than white milk for recovery 0.76
taste better in cup 0.76
be better than diet 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(drink, taste better in cup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(drink, taste better out of can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better out of can)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better in cup)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better out of can)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better in cup)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(soda, be better than diet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, be better than white milk for recovery)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, taste different at mcdonald 's)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(drink, taste better in cup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(drink, taste better out of can) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(soft drink, taste better in cans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(soda, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(coca cola, taste different at mcdonald 's) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(coca cola, taste different at mcdonald 's)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(chocolate milk, be better than white milk for recovery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, be better than white milk for recovery)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(soda, be better than diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(soda, be better than diet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cola, be better than pepsi)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cola, be different from fanta)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cola, be different from fanta)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cola, be different from fanta)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, taste better out of can)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, taste better in cup)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(coca cola, taste different at mcdonald 's)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, be better than white milk for recovery)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(soda, be better than diet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste better in cans)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(drink, taste better out of can)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, taste better in cup)