coca cola: be better than pepsi

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.73
, cola
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, soda pop
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than pepsi 1.00
be more popular than pepsi 0.94
be more expensive than pepsi 0.94
be more successful than pepsi 0.92
be better at at mcdonald 0.80
be different from fanta 0.77
be cheaper than water 0.76
be better than white milk for recovery 0.76
taste better in cup 0.76
be better than diet 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(drink, taste better in cup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cola, be different from fanta) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cola, be different from fanta)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(drink, taste better in cup)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cola, be different from fanta)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(drink, taste better in cup)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, be better than white milk for recovery)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(soda, be better than diet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(drink, taste better in cup) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cola, be different from fanta) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(soda, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(soda, be better than diet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(soda, be better than diet)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(chocolate milk, be better than white milk for recovery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, be better than white milk for recovery)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(coca cola, be better than pepsi)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cola, be different from fanta)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, taste better in cup)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(soda, be cheaper than water)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, be better than white milk for recovery)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(soda, be better than diet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cola, be different from fanta)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, taste better in cup)