coca cola: be more expensive than pepsi

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.73
, cola
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, soda pop
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than pepsi 1.00
be more popular than pepsi 0.96
be better than pepsi 0.94
be more successful than pepsi 0.93
is more expensive 0.86
be cheaper than water 0.83
be expensive in europe 0.78
mixed than than soda 0.76
is fucking cheap 0.76
be better at at mcdonald 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(soda, be cheaper than water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(soda, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(soda, be cheaper than water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(coca cola, be better at at mcdonald)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(coca cola, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(soda, be cheaper than water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cola, be better than pepsi)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in europe)