coca cola: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.73
, cola
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, soda pop
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
be cheaper than water 0.86
be more expensive than pepsi 0.86
has quality cost 0.77
be expensive in europe 0.77
be more successful than pepsi 0.76
is more enjoyable 0.76
be more popular than pepsi 0.76
be at clubs expensive 0.76
be in clubs expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be expensive in europe)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(soda, be cheaper than water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(soft drink, be expensive in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(soft drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(drink, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cola, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(soda, be cheaper than water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(soda, be cheaper than water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(coca cola, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more expensive than pepsi)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be cheaper than water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more successful than pepsi)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be expensive in europe)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be more popular than pepsi)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be expensive in europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(soda, be cheaper than water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cola, be cheaper than water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soft drink, be cheaper than water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drink, be cheaper than water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, be expensive in europe)