cold storage: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents storage
Weight: 0.68
, warehouse
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.61
, supermarket
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer disk
Weight: 0.34
, grain elevator
Weight: 0.32
, postal service
Weight: 0.32
, weather
Weight: 0.32
, fast food
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fast-food restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 1.00
be at fast food restaurant 0.90
be at chain restaurant 0.88
be at cheap restaurant 0.84
be at fast-food resturaunt 0.82
be used to store food 0.78
be used to hamburger 0.75
be at grocery store 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at chain restaurant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food resturaunt)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fast food, be at chain restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at chain restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food resturaunt)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food resturaunt)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cold storage, be at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cold storage, be used to store food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cold storage, be at grocery store)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cold storage, be at grocery store)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cold storage, be used to store food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(cold storage, be at grocery store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at grocery store)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(cold storage, be used to store food)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be used to store food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cold storage, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fast food, be at chain restaurant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food resturaunt)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cold storage, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger)