colleague: is wellness center

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents professor
Weight: 0.66
, teacher
Weight: 0.64
, mentor
Weight: 0.64
, researcher
Weight: 0.64
Siblings jim
Weight: 0.62
, steve
Weight: 0.57
, enrico fermi
Weight: 0.49
, scientist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is wellness center 1.00
has state wellness 0.94
is wellness differential 0.85
has physical part center 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(colleague, is wellness center)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(colleague, has state wellness)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(colleague, has state wellness)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(colleague, is wellness differential)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(colleague, has state wellness)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(colleague, is wellness differential)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(colleague, is wellness differential)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(colleague, has physical part center)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(colleague, has physical part center)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(colleague, has physical part center)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(colleague, has state wellness)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(colleague, has physical part center)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(colleague, is wellness differential)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(colleague, is wellness center)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(colleague, is wellness center)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(colleague, is wellness center)