colleague: is wellness differential

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents professor
Weight: 0.66
, teacher
Weight: 0.64
, mentor
Weight: 0.64
, researcher
Weight: 0.64
Siblings jim
Weight: 0.62
, steve
Weight: 0.57
, enrico fermi
Weight: 0.49
, scientist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is wellness differential 1.00
has quality differential 0.86
has state wellness 0.86
is wellness center 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(colleague, is wellness differential)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(colleague, is wellness center)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(colleague, has state wellness)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(colleague, has quality differential)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(colleague, has quality differential)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(colleague, has quality differential)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(colleague, has quality differential)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(colleague, has state wellness)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(colleague, is wellness center)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(colleague, has state wellness)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(colleague, is wellness center)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(colleague, has state wellness)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(colleague, is wellness center)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(colleague, is wellness differential)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(colleague, is wellness differential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(colleague, is wellness differential)