common law: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.77
, rule
Weight: 0.69
, authority
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.62
, immunity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings prohibition
Weight: 0.36
, ordinance
Weight: 0.35
, legislation
Weight: 0.35
, code
Weight: 0.34
, norm
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be better than law 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(authority, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(common law, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(authority, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(common law, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(common law, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(immunity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(common law, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(immunity, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(policy, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(authority, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(authority, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(immunity, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(authority, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(authority, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(code, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(norm, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(code, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(authority, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(authority, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(immunity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(legislation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(code, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ordinance, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(code, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prohibition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(norm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(norm, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(common law, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(common law, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(common law, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(common law, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(common law, be better than law)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(common law, be better than law)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(common law, be better than law)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(common law, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(common law, be better than law)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(common law, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(immunity, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(authority, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(authority, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(code, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(ordinance, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(legislation, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(code, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(norm, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(immunity, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(authority, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(common law, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(authority, has quality bad)