communicate: causes exchange information with another person

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.49
, information
Weight: 0.46
, word
Weight: 0.43
, example
Weight: 0.37
, time
Weight: 0.35
Siblings talk show
Weight: 0.30
, talk
Weight: 0.30
, common sense
Weight: 0.30
, message
Weight: 0.30
, sign language
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes exchange information with another person 1.00
causes information exchange 0.94
causes exchange information 0.94
be used to exchange information 0.92
causes exchange of information and idea 0.91
causes exchange of idea 0.84
causes exchange idea 0.84
causes share information with others 0.84
causes share information 0.81
causes gain new information 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes gain new information)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(talk, causes exchange of idea)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(talk, causes gain new information)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(talk, causes gain new information)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(communicate, causes exchange information)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(communicate, causes information exchange)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes information exchange)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(communicate, causes information exchange)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(communicate, causes exchange information)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(communicate, causes exchange of information and idea)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange of information and idea)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(communicate, causes share information with others)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(communicate, causes exchange of information and idea)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(communicate, causes share information with others)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange idea)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(communicate, causes exchange idea)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(communicate, causes exchange of information and idea)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes share information with others)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(communicate, causes information exchange)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(communicate, causes exchange idea)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(communicate, causes exchange information)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(communicate, causes exchange idea)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(communicate, causes share information with others)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(talk, causes exchange of idea)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(talk, causes gain new information)