communicate: causes information exchange

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.49
, information
Weight: 0.46
, word
Weight: 0.43
, example
Weight: 0.37
, time
Weight: 0.35
Siblings talk show
Weight: 0.30
, talk
Weight: 0.30
, common sense
Weight: 0.30
, message
Weight: 0.30
, sign language
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes information exchange 1.00
causes exchange information 1.00
be used to exchange information 0.98
causes exchange of information and idea 0.95
causes exchange information with another person 0.94
causes exchange of idea 0.87
causes exchange idea 0.87
causes share information 0.83
causes transfer of information 0.82
be used to get information 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(talk, causes exchange of idea)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(talk, causes exchange of idea)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(talk, be used to get information)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(talk, be used to get information)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(communicate, causes information exchange)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(communicate, causes exchange information)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(communicate, causes exchange information)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(communicate, causes exchange of information and idea)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(communicate, causes exchange information)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(communicate, causes exchange of information and idea)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(communicate, causes exchange idea)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange of information and idea)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(communicate, causes exchange of information and idea)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange information with another person)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(communicate, causes exchange idea)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(communicate, causes transfer of information)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(communicate, causes transfer of information)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes exchange idea)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes transfer of information)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(communicate, causes exchange idea)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(communicate, causes transfer of information)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes information exchange)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(communicate, causes information exchange)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(talk, be used to get information)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(communicate, causes information exchange)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(talk, causes exchange of idea)