communication: be important at work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important at work 1.00
be important in organisation 0.89
be important in georgraphy 0.89
be important for tcrm 0.88
be important in work environment 0.86
need work 0.85
work 0.84
be with people important 0.84
be important for business 0.82
be important part of life 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(communication, be important at work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(department, need work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(communication, be important at work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(failure, be important part of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(communication, be important at work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(failure, be important part of life)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(department, need work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important part of life)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(department, be important in organisation)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(department, need work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(infrared, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(coordination, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important at work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(department, need work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important at work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(failure, be important part of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important at work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(coordination, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(coordination, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(infrared, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(infrared, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(communication, be important at work)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(communication, be important in work environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(communication, be important at work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(department, need work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(failure, be important part of life)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(coordination, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(infrared, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(department, need work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(communication, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(failure, be important part of life)