communication: be important in work environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in work environment 1.00
be important in business environment 0.93
be important at work 0.86
be important in organisation 0.82
be important in georgraphy 0.82
be important in life 0.81
be important part of life 0.81
be important for tcrm 0.81
need work 0.81
be important for business 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(department, need work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(failure, be important part of life)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(failure, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(communication, be important in work environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(failure, be important in life)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(failure, be important part of life)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(department, need work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important in life)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important part of life)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(department, be important in organisation)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(department, need work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(department, need work)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(failure, be important part of life)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(failure, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(communication, be important in work environment)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(communication, be important in business environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in business environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important in business environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(communication, be important at work)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in business environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(communication, be important in life)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(communication, be important at work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important at work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(communication, be important in life)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in life)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in life)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(communication, be important in work environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(failure, be important in life)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(failure, be important part of life)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(department, need work)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(failure, be important in life)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(failure, be important part of life)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(department, need work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(communication, be important in work environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)