communication: be important for tcrm

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for tcrm 1.00
be important in organisation 0.97
be important in georgraphy 0.97
be important at work 0.88
be with people important 0.86
be important for business 0.86
be important part of life 0.85
be important in life 0.85
is vital 0.84
is major important 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(failure, be important part of life)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(failure, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(failure, be important in life)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(failure, be important part of life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important in life)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important part of life)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(failure, be important part of life)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(failure, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(communication, be important for tcrm)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(communication, be important at work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(communication, be important in life)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(communication, is vital)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(communication, be important at work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important at work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(communication, be important in life)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in life)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important at work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(communication, is vital)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(communication, is vital)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(communication, is vital)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(failure, be important in life)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(failure, be important part of life)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(failure, be important in life)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(failure, be important part of life)