communication: be important in human life

Related concepts

Parents	fundamental Weight: 0.64 , department Weight: 0.62 , gap Weight: 0.61 , failure Weight: 0.61
Siblings	coordination Weight: 0.57 , solicitation Weight: 0.54 , broadcasting Weight: 0.53 , acknowledgement Weight: 0.51 , infrared Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in human life	1.00
be important in human georgraphy	0.95
be important in life	0.92
is human	0.90
be important part of life	0.89
be used in life	0.85
be important in human geography	0.84
be used in everyday life	0.83
be considered human activity	0.81
be important in organisation	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(department, be important in organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(communication, be important in human life)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(failure, be important part of life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(communication, be important in human life)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(failure, be important in life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(communication, be important in human life)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(failure, be important in life)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(failure, be important part of life)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(failure, be important in life)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(failure, be important part of life)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used in life)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used in everyday life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(failure, be important in life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(communication, be important in human life)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(failure, be important part of life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(communication, be important in human life)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(department, be important in organisation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(communication, be important in human life)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(infrared, be used in life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(infrared, be used in life)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(infrared, be used in everyday life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(infrared, be used in everyday life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(communication, be important in human life)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human georgraphy)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in life)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(communication, be considered human activity)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(communication, be important in human georgraphy)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(communication, be important in life)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(communication, be considered human activity)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(communication, be considered human activity)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered human activity)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(communication, be important in human georgraphy)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(communication, be important in life)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(communication, be important in life)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(communication, be important in human georgraphy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(communication, be important in human life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(failure, be important in life)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(failure, be important part of life)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(infrared, be used in life)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(infrared, be used in everyday life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(failure, be important in life)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(failure, be important part of life)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(communication, be important in human life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)