communication: be considered human activity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered human activity 1.00
be considered activity 0.94
be activity 0.89
be social activity 0.86
have vital in physical activity time 0.85
be important in human georgraphy 0.82
is human 0.82
be important in human life 0.81
represent function of human language 0.77
be considered as process 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(coordination, have vital in physical activity time)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(coordination, have vital in physical activity time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(coordination, have vital in physical activity time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(communication, be considered human activity)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(communication, be social activity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(communication, be social activity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human georgraphy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in human life)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(communication, represent function of human language)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(communication, represent function of human language)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(communication, be social activity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(communication, represent function of human language)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(communication, be social activity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as process)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(communication, represent function of human language)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(communication, be important in human life)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(communication, be important in human georgraphy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in human life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(communication, be important in human life)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in human georgraphy)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(communication, be important in human georgraphy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered human activity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(communication, be considered human activity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered human activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(coordination, have vital in physical activity time)