competitor: be at sport event

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.58
, advantage
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, other person
Weight: 0.56
Siblings player
Weight: 0.69
, target
Weight: 0.62
, supplier
Weight: 0.60
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at sport event 1.00
win sport event 0.93
play sport 0.87
be important in sport 0.84
be at sport good store 0.84
letter in sport 0.78
master event 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(time, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(competitor, be at sport event)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(time, be important in sport)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(time, be important in sport)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(target, be at sport good store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(player, be at sport event)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be at sport event)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be at sport event)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(player, win sport event)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(athlete, letter in sport)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(athlete, play sport)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be important in sport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(time, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(competitor, be at sport event)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(player, be at sport event)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(player, win sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(player, win sport event)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(athlete, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(athlete, be at sport event)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(athlete, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(athlete, be at sport event)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(target, be at sport good store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(target, be at sport good store)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(athlete, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(athlete, be important in sport)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(athlete, play sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(athlete, play sport)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(athlete, letter in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(athlete, letter in sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(competitor, be at sport event)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(competitor, master event)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(competitor, master event)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(competitor, master event)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(competitor, master event)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(competitor, be at sport event)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(time, be important in sport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(athlete, be at sport event)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(athlete, be at sport event)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(player, be at sport event)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(athlete, play sport)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(athlete, letter in sport)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(player, win sport event)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(target, be at sport good store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(athlete, be important in sport)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(competitor, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(time, be important in sport)