composting: be than landfill

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, practice
Weight: 0.58
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.35
, waste
Weight: 0.34
, gardening
Weight: 0.34
, fermentation
Weight: 0.33
, organic chemistry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be than landfill 1.00
be than better landfill 0.98
be left at landfill site 0.94
reduce amount of waste placed in landfill 0.91
be left in piles at landfill site 0.90
reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill 0.90
decompose in landfill 0.90
decompose in municipal landfill 0.89
more is beneficial than landfills 0.88
eliminate landfills 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(waste, decompose in municipal landfill)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(waste, decompose in landfill)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(waste, be left in piles at landfill site)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(waste, decompose in landfill)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(waste, decompose in landfill)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(waste, decompose in municipal landfill)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waste, decompose in municipal landfill)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(waste, be left in piles at landfill site)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(waste, be left in piles at landfill site)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(composting, be than landfill)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than better landfill)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(composting, eliminate landfills)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(composting, eliminate landfills)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(composting, eliminate landfills)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(composting, be than better landfill)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(composting, be than better landfill)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(composting, eliminate landfills)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(composting, be than better landfill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(composting, be than landfill)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(waste, decompose in landfill)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(waste, decompose in municipal landfill)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(waste, be left in piles at landfill site)