composting: more is beneficial than landfills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, practice
Weight: 0.58
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.35
, waste
Weight: 0.34
, gardening
Weight: 0.34
, fermentation
Weight: 0.33
, organic chemistry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
more is beneficial than landfills 1.00
eliminate landfills 0.90
be than better landfill 0.89
be than landfill 0.88
reduce amount of waste placed in landfill 0.84
reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill 0.84
decompose in landfill 0.82
is better recycling 0.81
be left at landfill site 0.80
decompose in municipal landfill 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(waste, decompose in landfill)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(waste, decompose in municipal landfill)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(waste, decompose in landfill)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(waste, decompose in landfill)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(waste, decompose in municipal landfill)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waste, decompose in municipal landfill)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(composting, eliminate landfills)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(composting, eliminate landfills)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(composting, eliminate landfills)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than better landfill)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(composting, be than better landfill)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(composting, is better recycling)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(composting, be than landfill)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(composting, be than landfill)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(composting, eliminate landfills)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(composting, be than better landfill)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(composting, be than landfill)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(composting, is better recycling)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(composting, be than better landfill)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(composting, is better recycling)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(composting, is better recycling)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(waste, decompose in landfill)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(composting, more is beneficial than landfills)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(waste, decompose in municipal landfill)