composting: is recycling

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, practice
Weight: 0.58
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.35
, waste
Weight: 0.34
, gardening
Weight: 0.34
, fermentation
Weight: 0.33
, organic chemistry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is recycling 1.00
is better recycling 0.97
different to composting 0.83
be recycled 0.82
different to regular composting 0.81
be than landfill 0.81
reduce amount of waste placed in landfill 0.80
reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill 0.80
be recycled in nature 0.80
be than better landfill 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be recycled in nature)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(waste, be recycled)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(waste, be recycled)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(waste, be recycled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(waste, be recycled)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(waste, be recycled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(waste, be recycled)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(waste, be recycled in nature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(composting, is recycling)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(composting, is better recycling)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(composting, different to regular composting)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than better landfill)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(composting, be than landfill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(composting, different to composting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(composting, different to composting)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(composting, be than better landfill)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(composting, be than landfill)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(composting, is better recycling)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(composting, be than landfill)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(composting, reduce amount of solid waste placed in landfill)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(composting, be than better landfill)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(composting, be than landfill)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(composting, reduce amount of waste placed in landfill)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(composting, different to composting)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(composting, is better recycling)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(composting, be than better landfill)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(composting, different to regular composting)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(composting, different to composting)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(composting, is better recycling)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(composting, different to regular composting)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(composting, different to regular composting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(composting, is recycling)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(composting, is recycling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(waste, be recycled)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(waste, be recycled)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(composting, is recycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(waste, be recycled in nature)