comprehension: be important in language learning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.55
, reading
Weight: 0.55
, aspect
Weight: 0.54
, topic
Weight: 0.51
Siblings vocabulary
Weight: 0.32
, grammar school
Weight: 0.32
, math
Weight: 0.32
, repetition
Weight: 0.32
, stupidity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in language learning 1.00
be important for literacy instruction 0.81
reading fluency 0.79
be important to reading 0.77
be important in reading process 0.77
be important to reading process 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(comprehension, be important in language learning)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(comprehension, reading fluency)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(comprehension, be important in reading process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(comprehension, be important in reading process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(comprehension, be important to reading process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(comprehension, be important to reading)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(comprehension, be important to reading)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(comprehension, reading fluency)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(comprehension, be important to reading process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(comprehension, be important for literacy instruction)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(comprehension, reading fluency)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(comprehension, be important in reading process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(comprehension, be important to reading)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(comprehension, be important to reading process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(comprehension, be important for literacy instruction)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(comprehension, be important in reading process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(comprehension, be important to reading)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(comprehension, be important to reading process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(comprehension, reading fluency)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(comprehension, be important for literacy instruction)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(comprehension, be important for literacy instruction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(comprehension, be important in language learning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(comprehension, be important in language learning)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(comprehension, be important in language learning)