concrete: be building

Related concepts

Parents	flooring Weight: 0.69 , raw material Weight: 0.63 , substance Weight: 0.62 , stone Weight: 0.60 , surface Weight: 0.60
Siblings	asphalt Weight: 0.55 , granite Weight: 0.35 , steel Weight: 0.35 , tile Weight: 0.35 , kidney stone Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be building	1.00
be good for building	0.93
is building material	0.88
was building material	0.87
be as building material	0.87
is important building material	0.87
is good building material	0.86
was useful building material	0.82
was building material to romans	0.79
was useful building material to romans	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(stone, is good building material) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(concrete, be building)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(stone, is good building material)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(stone, is good building material)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(granite, is good building material)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(granite, is building material)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(stone, is good building material) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(concrete, be building)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(granite, is building material) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(granite, is building material)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(granite, is good building material) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(granite, is good building material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(concrete, be building)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(concrete, is building material)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(concrete, be as building material)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(concrete, be good for building)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(concrete, was building material)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(concrete, is building material)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(concrete, is building material)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(concrete, was building material)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(concrete, be as building material)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(concrete, be as building material)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(concrete, was building material)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(concrete, is building material)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(concrete, be as building material)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(concrete, was building material)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(concrete, be good for building)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(concrete, is good building material)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(concrete, is good building material)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(concrete, is good building material)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(concrete, be good for building)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(concrete, be good for building)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Salient(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(concrete, be building)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(concrete, be building)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(granite, is building material)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(granite, is good building material)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(concrete, be building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)