concrete: be good for building

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.69
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.55
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, tile
Weight: 0.35
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for building 1.00
be building 0.93
is good building material 0.90
is important building material 0.86
be as building material 0.84
is building material 0.84
was building material 0.84
was useful building material 0.83
was useful building material to romans 0.78
was building material to romans 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(concrete, be good for building)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(stone, is good building material)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(stone, is good building material)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(granite, is good building material)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(granite, is building material)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(concrete, be good for building)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(granite, is good building material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(granite, is good building material)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(granite, is building material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(granite, is building material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(concrete, be good for building)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(concrete, be building)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(concrete, be building)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(concrete, be building)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(concrete, is building material)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(concrete, be as building material)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(concrete, was building material)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(concrete, is good building material)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(concrete, is good building material)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(concrete, is building material)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(concrete, be as building material)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(concrete, be as building material)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(concrete, is building material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(concrete, was building material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(concrete, was building material)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concrete, is good building material)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be building)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be as building material)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concrete, was building material)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is building material)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be good for building)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(concrete, be good for building)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(granite, is building material)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(granite, is good building material)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(concrete, be good for building) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)