congo: be considered weak state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.54
, hot spot
Weight: 0.54
, south america
Weight: 0.53
, region
Weight: 0.53
Siblings mali
Weight: 0.34
, latin america
Weight: 0.34
, zambia
Weight: 0.34
, sierra leone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered weak state 1.00
is weak state 0.95
is weak 0.90
be considered state 0.85
is poor country 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(region, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(congo, be considered weak state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(region, is weak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(region, is weak)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mali, is poor country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(region, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(congo, be considered weak state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(mali, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mali, is poor country)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(zambia, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(zambia, is poor country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(congo, be considered weak state)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(congo, be considered state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(congo, be considered state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(congo, is weak state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(congo, is weak state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(congo, is weak state)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(congo, be considered weak state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(congo, be considered weak state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(region, is weak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mali, is poor country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(zambia, is poor country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(congo, be considered weak state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(region, is weak)