congo: is weak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.54
, hot spot
Weight: 0.54
, south america
Weight: 0.53
, region
Weight: 0.53
Siblings mali
Weight: 0.34
, latin america
Weight: 0.34
, zambia
Weight: 0.34
, sierra leone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is weak 1.00
is weak state 0.95
be considered weak state 0.90
is poor 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(region, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(congo, is weak)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(congo, is weak)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(region, is weak)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(region, is weak)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mali, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(region, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(congo, is weak)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(congo, is weak)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mali, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mali, is poor)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zambia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(zambia, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(congo, is weak)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(congo, is weak state)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(congo, be considered weak state)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(congo, be considered weak state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(congo, is weak state)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(congo, is weak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(region, is weak)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mali, is poor)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(zambia, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(region, is weak)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(congo, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)