congo: is poor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.54
, hot spot
Weight: 0.54
, south america
Weight: 0.53
, region
Weight: 0.53
Siblings mali
Weight: 0.34
, latin america
Weight: 0.34
, zambia
Weight: 0.34
, sierra leone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor 1.00
is poor country 0.93
is republic poor 0.81
is poorest country 0.79
is weak 0.76
is weak state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(congo, is poor)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(region, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(congo, is poor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(region, is weak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(region, is weak)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mali, is poor country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(mali, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(congo, is poor)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(region, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(congo, is poor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(mali, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(mali, is poor)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zambia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(zambia, is poor)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(mali, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(mali, is poor country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(zambia, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(zambia, is poor country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(congo, is poor)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(congo, is poor country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(congo, is poor country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(congo, is poor country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poorest country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor country)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(congo, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(region, is weak)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(mali, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mali, is poor country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(zambia, is poor)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(zambia, is poor country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(congo, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(region, is weak)