conservation: be necessary for solar energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be necessary for solar energy 1.00
be necessary for energy 0.90
impact use of renewable energy 0.84
is renewable 0.80
be considered renewable resource 0.78
is renewable resource 0.78
reduce energy use 0.78
impact use of energy 0.77
reduce amount of energy 0.77
reduce amount of energy used 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(issue, impact use of energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(issue, impact use of energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(issue, impact use of renewable energy)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(issue, impact use of energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(issue, impact use of energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of energy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of renewable energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of energy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of renewable energy)