wildlife: be considered renewable resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered renewable resource 1.00
be considered resource 0.89
be natural resource 0.85
is natural resource 0.84
has quality resource 0.82
be necessary for solar energy 0.78
be more important than resources 0.76
be necessary for energy 0.76
be different from other resources 0.75
be different from resources like land 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(land, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(resource, be different from other resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(land, be considered resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(land, is natural resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(land, has quality resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(resource, be different from other resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resource, be different from other resources)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(land, has quality resource)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(land, is natural resource)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(land, be considered resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(land, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(resource, be different from other resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered resource)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(wildlife, be considered resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(resource, be considered resource)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(land, be considered resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(land, has quality resource)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(resource, be different from other resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(resource, be considered resource)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(land, be considered resource)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(land, has quality resource)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(resource, be different from other resources)