wildlife: be considered resource

Related concepts

Parents	land Weight: 0.62 , resource Weight: 0.58 , subject Weight: 0.56 , attraction Weight: 0.55 , topic Weight: 0.55
Siblings	geyser Weight: 0.43 , national forest Weight: 0.35 , wetland Weight: 0.35 , conservation Weight: 0.34 , animal husbandry Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered resource	1.00
be natural resource	0.90
is natural resource	0.90
has quality resource	0.89
be considered renewable resource	0.89
be considered	0.80
be more important than resources	0.78
is more important than physical resources	0.77
be more important than physical resources	0.77
be different from resources like land	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered resource)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(resource, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered resource)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered resource)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(land, is natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered resource)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered resource)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(resource, be more important than physical resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered resource)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(resource, is more important than physical resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(resource, be considered resource)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(land, be considered resource)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(land, is natural resource)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(resource, is more important than physical resources)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(land, has quality resource)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(resource, be more important than physical resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(land, has quality resource)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(resource, be more important than physical resources)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(resource, is more important than physical resources)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(land, is natural resource)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(land, be considered resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(resource, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(land, is natural resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(resource, be more important than physical resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(resource, is more important than physical resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(wildlife, be considered resource)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is natural resource)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(wildlife, is natural resource)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(wildlife, is natural resource)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(wildlife, is natural resource)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(wildlife, be natural resource)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(wildlife, has quality resource)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(resource, be considered resource)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(land, be considered resource)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(resource, is more important than physical resources)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(land, has quality resource)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(resource, be more important than physical resources)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(resource, be considered resource)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(land, be considered resource)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(resource, is more important than physical resources)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(land, has quality resource)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(wildlife, be considered resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(resource, be more important than physical resources)