resource: be considered resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
, document
Weight: 0.59
, barrier
Weight: 0.58
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.72
, mineral
Weight: 0.68
, solar energy
Weight: 0.67
, coral reef
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered resource 1.00
be considered as resource 0.99
be considered best resource 0.95
be considered as best resource 0.94
is important resource 0.93
is most important resource 0.92
has quality resource 0.89
is valuable resource 0.89
is most valuable resource 0.89
is central resource 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(solar energy, be considered resource)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(solar energy, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(solar energy, be considered resource)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(natural gas, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(resource, be considered resource)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered best resource)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered as best resource)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(resource, is central resource)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(resource, is central resource)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(resource, is central resource)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(resource, is central resource)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(resource, has quality resource)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(resource, be considered as best resource)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(resource, be considered best resource)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(resource, be considered as best resource)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(resource, be considered best resource)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(resource, be considered as best resource)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(resource, be considered best resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(resource, be considered resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(natural gas, has quality resource)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(solar energy, be considered resource)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)