wildlife: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
is natural resource 0.90
be natural resource 0.90
be considered resource 0.89
be considered renewable resource 0.82
be more important than resources 0.79
is more important than physical resources 0.79
has quality good 0.79
has quality asset 0.78
be more important than physical resources 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(land, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(resource, be more important than physical resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(resource, is more important than physical resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(resource, be considered resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(land, be considered resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(land, is natural resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(land, has quality resource)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(resource, is more important than physical resources)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(resource, be more important than physical resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(land, has quality resource)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(resource, be more important than physical resources)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(resource, is more important than physical resources)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(resource, be considered resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(land, is natural resource)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(land, be considered resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wetland, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(land, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(land, is natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(resource, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(resource, is more important than physical resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(resource, be more important than physical resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(conservation, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(wetland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(wildlife, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered resource)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(wildlife, be considered resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(wildlife, is natural resource)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be natural resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wildlife, be considered renewable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wildlife, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(resource, be considered resource)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(land, be considered resource)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(resource, is more important than physical resources)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(land, has quality resource)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(resource, be more important than physical resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(conservation, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wetland, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(resource, be considered resource)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(land, be considered resource)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(land, is natural resource)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(land, has quality resource)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(resource, is more important than physical resources)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(wildlife, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(resource, be more important than physical resources)