conservation: be necessary for energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be necessary for energy 1.00
be necessary for solar energy 0.90
is necessary 0.87
be necessary for development 0.83
be necessary to life 0.82
be necessary for sustainable development 0.82
is needed 0.82
impact use of renewable energy 0.81
reduce amount of energy used 0.80
reduce energy use 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(topic, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(topic, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(concept, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(strategy, is needed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(issue, impact use of renewable energy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is needed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concept, is necessary)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(topic, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(animal husbandry, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(topic, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(strategy, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(animal husbandry, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(animal husbandry, is necessary)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(biodiversity, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, is necessary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(recycling, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(recycling, is necessary)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(conservation, be necessary for energy)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(conservation, is necessary)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is necessary)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(conservation, is needed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is needed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(conservation, is necessary)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(conservation, is necessary)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(conservation, is needed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(conservation, is needed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for solar energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of renewable energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(animal husbandry, is necessary)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(biodiversity, is necessary)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(recycling, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(recycling, be necessary for sustainable development)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(strategy, is needed)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(conservation, be necessary for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of renewable energy)