:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cook, is paid)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, is paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cook, is paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, is paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cook, is paid)
Similarity expansion
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cook, is paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cook, is paid little)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(cook, is paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cook, is paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cook, is paid)
Typical implies Plausible
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, is paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cook, is paid)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cook, is paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cook, is paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)