cooked food: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality bad 0.90
be better than food 0.82
be better than raw 0.80
be better than raw food 0.78
keep longer than fresh food 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(cooked food, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cooked food, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(cooked food, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cooked food, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cooked food, be better than food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cooked food, be better than food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cooked food, be better than raw)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cooked food, be better than raw food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cooked food, be better than raw)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cooked food, keep longer than fresh food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(cooked food, keep longer than fresh food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(cooked food, be better than food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, be better than raw)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cooked food, be better than raw food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cooked food, be better than raw)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, keep longer than fresh food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cooked food, keep longer than fresh food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cooked food, be better than raw food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, be better than raw food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, be better than food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(cooked food, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cooked food, has quality better)