cooking utensil: have have made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.76
, frying pan
Weight: 0.75
, item
Weight: 0.68
, necessity
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.78
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.76
, spoon
Weight: 0.70
, wok
Weight: 0.65
, coffee maker
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have have made 1.00
be made of aluminium 0.92
have have made of bakelite 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(utensil, have have made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(utensil, have have made of bakelite)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have have made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cooking utensil, have have made)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cooking utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(utensil, have have made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(utensil, have have made of bakelite)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(utensil, have have made)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(utensil, have have made of bakelite)