cooking utensil: have have made of bakelite

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.76
, frying pan
Weight: 0.75
, item
Weight: 0.68
, necessity
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.78
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.76
, spoon
Weight: 0.70
, wok
Weight: 0.65
, coffee maker
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have have made of bakelite 1.00
handles have made of bakelite 0.92
be made of metal 0.79
be made of aluminum 0.77
have have made 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(utensil, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(frying pan, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(utensil, have have made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminum)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have have made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(utensil, handles have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(utensil, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(frying pan, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(cooking utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cooking utensil, be made of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, be made of metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, be made of metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, be made of metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(cooking utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cooking utensil, have have made)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metal)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(utensil, have have made)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of aluminum)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of metal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(utensil, have have made of bakelite)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(utensil, handles have made of bakelite)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metal)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(utensil, have have made)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cooking utensil, have have made of bakelite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of aluminum)