utensil: be made of aluminium

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made of aluminium 1.00
is made 0.98
have have made 0.92
be made of plastic 0.79
be made of iron 0.76
be made of metal 0.76
be made of silver 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scissors, be made of metal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of aluminium)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(utensil, is made)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(utensil, is made)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(utensil, is made)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(utensil, have have made)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(utensil, have have made)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(utensil, have have made)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of iron)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of silver)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of iron)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of silver)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of silver)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of silver)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have have made)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of aluminium)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(scissors, be made of metal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of metal)