utensil: be made of iron

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made of iron 1.00
be on cast iron 0.86
be made of steel 0.79
be made of metal 0.79
made of metal 0.78
be made up of metal 0.78
have made of wood plastic 0.78
be made of aluminium 0.76
be made of aluminum 0.75
be made of copper 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of steel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scissors, be made of metal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(spoon, be made of steel)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of steel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of iron)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(utensil, be on cast iron)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, made of metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of steel)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(utensil, made of metal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(utensil, made of metal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of steel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of steel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of steel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(utensil, made of metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(utensil, be on cast iron)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(utensil, be on cast iron)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of copper)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be on cast iron)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of copper)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of copper)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of copper)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of iron)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(scissors, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of steel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of iron)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of metal)